Comparison of the theories of feminism

Comparison of the theories of feminist movementFeminism has a drift has gained momentum in recent pasts to the extent that thither are a number of gender gains the cosmea over. The theories of womens lib are categorized into five, just about of which are distinct and opposite closely related. These are munificent Feminism, left Feminism Radical Feminism Post-Modern Feminism and Multicultural feminism. However, this paper zeroes downhearted on two, namely Liberal and Radical feminism, in an attempt to fancy the contri stillion that feminism has made (or continues to make) in the contemporary social analysis.Liberal FeminismSome of the prop unitarynts of this category of feminism include Mary Wollstonecraft, legerdemain Stuart Mill, Betty Friedan and Rebecca Walker.Liberal feminism is an individualistic form of feminism because it is gener everyy establish on womens ability to assert their comparison through their own influenceions and choices. This is what Eleanor calls trust in rationality (Eleanor, 1996). Accordingly, the jump point for promoting such equality is found on individual interaction between men and women and that women cannister transpose their circumstances. Liberal feminism looks at the personal interactions of men and women as the starting ground from which to transform union into a more gender-equitable place.The solvents important t to liberal feminists include reproductive rights and abortion access, inner harassment, voting, education, fair recompense for work, affordable childcare, affordable health care, and bringing to light the frequency of sexual and domestic violence against women.The basic tenet of liberal feminism is that it is anchored on legal and political reform as a mode to ensuring equality between men and women. This, according to them, is tailored on looking at the government through lobby groupings to bring about legislative changes that throw in on gender equity. This brings about social and econom ical equity. Susan Wendell, citing the work of Mackinnon (1987) () says that contemporary feminism is committed to major economic reorganization and considerable redistribution of wealth, since one of the current political goals more or less closely associated with liberal feminism is equality of fortune which would undoubtedly require and lead to both. Liberal feminists fight that all battalion are equal and that rationality in correcting class differences should be the guidance to go.How then does this contribute to social analysis? It does so by beholding the oppression of women as not morphologic feature of capitalistic economic outline. Further, the concept of education as a means to changing womens location quo has had remarkable gains in recent times. Additionally, the ongoing debate and actions in the demesne concerning expansion of women violateicipation has fundamentally centered on inclusiveness into the socio-economic as fountainhead as the political mainstre am,Radical Feminism use Mackinnon, (198716), Eleanor observes that that radical feminism is not one form of feminism, but simply feminism unmodified. Therefore, more others forms of feminism was only a response to male psyche readjustment of feminism as it were. (Eleanor, 1996)Feminism in its radical sense has it that ordination is a patriarchy that primarily oppresses women thus radical feminists seek to dethaw patriarchy. In this, they recognize that womens oppression is the fundamental oppression. They further assert deep that sexism is at the heart of patriarchy e particular(prenominal)ly in the family. Willis (1981), for example, in an attempt Lust Horizons Is the womens movement pro-sex argues against making alliances with the political right in ohmic resistance to pornography In a way they in this sense, echo the red ink belief that if women wanted to tummy with the shackles of patriarchy, then they must deal with the set off of reproduction. (Willis, 1981)According to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, most radical feminists do not universally argue for the criminalization of pornography or objectification of women, but rather that in the absence of patriarchy, the public demand for such materials would drastically decrease as a much smaller percentage of the population would be worked up by viewing womens oppression and degradationConclusively, radical feminism is anchored on total restructuring if society an extreme view which would call for severing relationships with men, that is closure heterosexual relationship with me.Radical feminists seem to believe that the way to deal with patriarchy and oppression of all kinds is to address the underlying causes of these problems through revolution.Q2. cognitive Theory of Social comparison in explaining Crowd behavior at a large (50,000+) sporting eventsIntroductionA tug can be defined in a number of ways but the widely accepted definition of host is that of large groups of individuals in the i dentical physical environment, sharing a common goal. usually such individuals act in a different way than when they are alone. (Reading, 1996)In a football match scenario, understanding the behavior of the crowd can be grounded on cognitive conjecture of social comparison. This theory as advanced(a) by Festinger (1952), asserts that people tend to examine their behavior with others that are most like them. peck and Thulman (1986) using the ideas of Festinger gives a more specific avouchment by saying that people, when lacking objective means for appraisal of their opinions and capabilities, compare their opinions and capabilities to those of others that are similar to them. In the touch, they attempt to correct any differences found. can on this social comparison theory may explain crowd behavior in a football match in the pursual waysCommon Stimulus between crowd participantsAccording to Muss and Thulman (1986), one of the social comparisons theory implications is group f ormation. This according to them happens to the extent that ego evaluation can only be accomplished by means of comparison with other persons. Festinger attributes this to the fact people in a crowd are driven by the desire to belong to the group. In other al-Qurans, they tend to move to a group which belongs to them and which share their opinion and who take a shit almost similar ability. For instance, it is common to see football fans that gage a particular team more interested in being at heart the physical boundaries of their fellow supporters or those who share in their fantasy.Imitational behaviorUsing Festinger ideas, Muse and Thulman (1986) explains that the existence of a discrepancy in a group with respect to opinions or abilities will lead to action on the part of members of that group to reduce the discrepancyThis should explain some behaviors in a football match setting, including one person starting to sing and the others who support the same team following swiftl y. Other examples would include, booing a player, usually started by one person and followed swiftly by others.A more propounding lesson is such crowd behavior in an event of a stampede. Usually people will tend to run to one direction unheeding of if the cause of fear is genuine or not, as long as the one of their own signals them to do so.Q3. Use sociological theories or concepts to befriend explain Listening to medicine on a take-away music deviceIntroductionIt is common today to see people crossways all ages and gender alike carrying and listening to music through takeout devices publicly. This happens when they are in the office, driving, reading and even walking among othersWhile there should be a number of theories that can explain this phenomenon, system theory, does that at best in trying to justify the tight schedules that the contemporary society puts on people and the dilemmas therein. In so doing it zeroes on multit soliciting as the issue or as a prime causality to this.System theorySystem theory may be traced back to the ideas of George Hegel (1770-1831), who saw the human race as operating within the push of different poles, in the process creating a conflict which negates a solution for the functioning of the whole system. Hegel imagined that the world was controlled by two opposing poles pulling towards opposite direction. He called one pole the thesis and the opposing side the antithesis. According to him, these two contest to create an agreed position he called the synthesis, which interestingly also come to create the thesis, the antithesis and the cycle goes on and on. In a way, one would argue that this corresponds directly to the conflict theory, but for the purposes of looking at the phenomenon as a response to holistic demands, the perspective is tied to system theory. (Pippin, 1989)Notably, the person who suffice system theory as we know it today (within a structural functionalism paradigm) is Von Bertalanffy is a book titl ed General system theory Foundations, Development, Applications in 1968. He, as a biologist, endeavored to employ organismic knowledge to use the word system to describe those principles which are common to a general system.In the book, he says that there exist models, principles, and laws that apply to generalized systems or their subclasses, no matter of their particular kind, the nature of their component elements, and the relationships or forces between them. It seems legitimate to ask for a theory, not of systems of a more or less special kind, but of universal principles applying to systems in generalSystem theory is ground on the belief that for a system (a being, an entity, an organization among others) to work sufficiently, all the parts of that system must be in order, and that there is interrelation of the parts.To qualify this theory in understanding the portable music system public use phenomenon, it is important to relate it to the numerous issues that todays human responds to, within the confluence of multitasking and not able to respond to other demands of life. Therefore, listening to portable music while responding to other systems, not only works to preserve interrelatedness of demands of today but also in satisfying his/her needs.