Is Milk Healthy for You? Essay

The galvanize of e real mammals feel story begins with the consumption of take push through, whether it is from its mother or a bottle. All womanly mammals produce draw and its their responsibility to feed their take come to the fore to their offspring. The supreme earth is to give the offspring altogether of the vitamins and minerals in take out that go away entirelyow them to grow big and strong, while also filling their appetite. around of the ingredients comprise in milk that ar necessary for our bodies to function on a daily basis argon things such(prenominal) as dineros, spicy, protein, enzymes, and vitamin D and A.All baby mammals must inebriety milk to start their life so that they gage grow up life story strong and sanitary lives. Without all of these vital components found in milk, life as we turn in it may cease to exist. Drinking milk has been the way of life for all mammals and homos since the beginning of time, which only backs up the fact that milk is very wellnessy for our bodies. Some people sound off differently of this issue and feel out that milk is the wrong select for us and that it tummy be quite a harmful.If weve been insobriety milk for thousands of years and it contains all of these necessary ingredients for our bodies to function properly, how send word milk suddenly be a terrible choice for our bodies? To start off, milk has several different components within it that benefit our bodies and assist in optimum daily functioning. These ingredients also help prove why milk is definitely a muscular choice to drink. Milk contains carbohydrates to give your personate fuel by providing energy to the cells in your dust. It has protein to help build vigor and other tissues.It also contains enzymes to speed up the deal of washing dump materials in your body such as food. Last only if non least, it is a gr eat up source of vitamin A, for eye sight, and vitamin D, to help thread the calcium in your bod y to build bone strength. Despite the fact that on the milk carton it says it contains all of these nutrients, people still believe that milk isnt a sun-loving choice. Even with these facts, people still think that milk is bad for us. Dont get me wrong, there be people in the world that dont drink milk for legitimate dry lands that atomic number 18 unrelated to sustenanceary factors.One common reason is lactose intolerance. Lots of people around the world argon k straightway to sire acquired this syndrome. I say acquired be puddle more(prenominal) times than non, a person obtains intolerance for the lactose in milk products after the weaning process of birth rather than real cosmos born with it. The basic comment of lactose intolerance is that people have an insufficient amount of lactase, an enzyme that catalyzes lactose into all of its components, in their digestive system. This could be a legitimate reason not to drink milk un slight these people arent the ones pr ecept milk is bad for you. several(prenominal) other reason may be because of the food grain or taste. Some people just dont racket the taste that milk has to offer. differents may not like how thick and chromatic it may be compared to water. All of these reasons are acceptable explanations to dislike drinking milk. Its when people dont drink milk because of nutritional reasons that should be frowned upon. Now that our excused milk drinkers are free of charge, lets talk near the unexcused. There is an astounding amount of sources that can be found online to support the abolition of milk in the human diet.Many clauses rant on round all of the factors of milk that can harm your body. Examples of these statements include things such as milk having the capability to cast bone density. Cindy Jones-Shoeman, a published writer for Natural News, writes in an article from February 2009 about how a woman by the name of Vivian Goldschmidt said, the physical protein found in milk tru ly depletes the human body of calcium, exactly the glacial of what milk drinkers expect it to do, (Jones-Shoeman).Vivian may have an MA in nutrition, alone what she doesnt mention in her article is that it specifies in bone health nutrition even more specifically dealing with antidotes for osteoporosis. She gives no raise in the article proving that calcium does this sort of defame to our body. I think we can now infer that she may be quite assured about the osteoporosis portion of bone health scarcely not about the facts of milk and its effects on the human body. This is why people should be dubious when reading articles online. You never know what nonsense you might bollix upon.To dig deeper into her credentials, Vivian claims to have been diagnosed with osteoporosis but has dealt with and supposedly cured herself of this disease in her own natural manner without medication. She was the creator and founder of an organization called render Our Bones, which is profitable a s a company by earning money exchange their merchandise such as books and magazines about how to strengthen bone health for osteoporosis patients. What we may not notice is what she said about the animal protein in milk causing the depletion of calcium in our body.She doesnt specify what the animal protein is or even how its process of destroying calcium works. This delegacy she is saying that this unambiguous protein, when consumed, pull up stakes obliterate the calcium content that our body has already employ? I may not know much about protein facts, but I know enough to say that the world has been drinking milk for generations upon generations and there has been no explicit evidence proving that people have in reality been losing calcium from drinking milk, which is comprised of 30% calcium minerals.Being that it is one of the some commonly found minerals in the body, calcium is the nutrient any living mammal needs for their step-up and stability. Without it, our bones w ould be jell-o and our teeth would be spongy. So now that we see milk is healthy for us, which case of milk should we pick? There are numerous types of milk alternatives out there in the world for people to test out and discover, but only one type should be chosen. All milk begins on the totally milk side of the spectrum and continues on to avoirdupois-free skim milk when avoirdupoiss are distilled out of it.When people hear the word fat they acquit its malignant to our bodies and could make us fatter and more obese in return. The number one reason for people choosing lower berth-fat milk rather than tout ensemble milk in their diet is because they think these fats are bad for us. Lower-fat milks are also argued to be healthier than full-length milk because they have lower quantities of saturated fat, which has been linked to a variety of serious health conditions such as cardiovascular disease, strokes, and even types of cancer.Both of these factors supposedly add to the ev idence that lower-fat milks help your seek of heart diseases and other potentially fatal diseases along with the ability to lose weight. But unfortunately, the people who agree with these statements would be wrong. Other websites are on the same track in saying that satisfying milk is the basis of a lot of health problems such as heart disease, strokes, high cholesterol, and diabetes (Internet Brands). Some people claim that the saturated fat in milk is to blame for these tribulations.Ironically, all of these so-called facts have been be to have the exact opposite results. Science has now revealed that the link amid saturated fat and heart diseases is tenuous at best. Two highly honored doctors of nutrition along with a man who mastered in nutrition contributed to the American Journal for Clinical Nutrition about the misinterpreted aspect of saturated fat. One of the doctors, Ancel Keys, has prominently worked on studies in the 1950s which resulted with his canvas titled Chol esterol Controversy, in which he added on to the Journal with later.Their synopsis about saturated fat states that it has been proven to be very estimable to the human body to consume saturated fat, although in moderation. Their studies show that consuming saturated fats raised good cholesterol the kind of cholesterol you motive and need in your body to stay healthy. They even specifically added in their paper that, we are in danger of ill health unless we drink milk because, in letters a foot high, EVERY clay NEEDS MILK, (Keys, Grande, and Anderson). Now that this subject has been cleared up for the misinformed people, we can now move on to even more in depth controversies about the types of milk.Another common misconception is that extracting the fat out of whole milk go forth make it healthier for humans. Whole milk contains roughly 3. 5% fat while skim milk contains essentially no fat and 2% and 1% milk are self-explanatory, but these fats are actually not bad for us at a ll. Most people would think that less fat means a more pure product, which would intuitively be healthier. The fact is that the fats in whole milk are not actually harmful to our body at all but instead should be known as dietary fats that our body needs and uses in electropositive ways.Our body uses the fats in whole milk as a carbohydrate to help yield the energy we exert every day. But ultimately, these fats are absolutely essential for the switching down process of the vitamins and minerals that whole milk supplies us with. The Office of Dietary Supplements the National Institute of Health states in one of their articles that the vitamins such as vitamin A and D are fat soluble (Vitamin A and Vitamin D). This means that our bodies cant absorb these minerals from milk if all the fat has been skimmed off because the fat is what helps break down the nutrients so our body can access and absorb them.Another article also declares that, you can pump fat-free milk safe of a years s upply of vitamins A and D, but the body cant access them, because the fats are not there to break them down for the body to absorb (Bergeson). Also, these milk fats contain glycosphingolipids, which are the types of fats that are linked to good repellent system health and cell metabolic process (Bergeson). Eating these fats with our daily portion of milk assists in reducing the risk of heart disease and strokes, which proves the earlier statements to be incorrect.Milk that is fat lessen is actually known to lose some of the nutritional content as well. To fix this issue, companies that make lower-fat milk will inject, either in limpid or powder form, alternative vitamins and minerals to keep the nutrient levels the same what it started at this being when it began as whole milk. But as utter before, no matter how many extra nutrients are pumped into the lower-fat milks, they are not accessible because of the absence of fats to break them down.So it turns out, the fat in whole mi lk is actually not bad for you at all, but actually is necessary to allow your body access to the vitamins and minerals in whole milk. As well as the fat content, people are always unreassuring about the saturated fat and mineral content on the labels of all of their foods that they eat. Do people even know what they are counting at? Maybe if we all take a quick and careful look at the labels on the cartons we can solve this in a childlike and trouble-free manner. Whole milk does in fact have a high saturated fat percentage in it than lower-fat milk types on the market, but this isnt necessarily a bad thing.I stated before how saturated fat is good for you in moderation but there is an even simpler way of determining if something is healthy for you or not by just looking closely at the label. On every label of milk are the daily percents contiguous to each nutritional label. Based on a 2000 kilocalorie per day diet, these daily value, or DV, percentages describe the daily valu e percentage of a nutrient we are receiving from one serving of a particular milk brand. Surprisingly to some people, saturated fat has a percent of daily value next to it, which implies that we need saturated fat in our diet to be healthy in moderation of course.Better yet, whole milk, which gives us 25% of our DV percent, supplies us with more of a portion of that daily percentage than lower-fat milks, which can enjoin from 15% to 0%. With lower-fat milks having less saturated fat percentages in them, we would have to drink more to get our daily percent for the day, which also means more calories. So, even though whole milk has 150 calories per shape and average lower-fat milks have 130, you would still have to drink more cups of lower-fat milk to get your daily value of each nutrient label.As a result, you are literally hurting yourself by consuming more calories than needed. If a healthy diet consists of 2000 calories, you would have to find an alternative source to come bac k the informality of the nutrients you are lacking when drinking lower-fat milk, while also being careful not go over a healthy calorie diet. To expand further on the calorie controversy, whole milk has a thicker content than that of lower-fat milk because it is composed of all of the nutritious fats that we need. I am intending to imply that because whole milk is thicker, and it will fill you up quick than lower-fat milks will.This means that when people consume lower-fat milks, they tend to be hungrier more very much because their milk does not always occupy their hunger. In turn, this will cause them to either drink more of their milk or eat more of other foods. If they choose to drink more of their lower-fat milk, they are only adding on the extra calories that their body doesnt need, which would end up being higher than just drinking whole milk. They also might choose to eat on more junk food, such as sweets or salty snacks, to please their craving which will do even more damage to their health and figure.Now granted, some of us may choose a healthier option to snack on such as fruits or vegetables, but when we have hunger pains we will eat anything to satisfy it. The previous paradox will thus contribute to the process of weight gain rather than losing weight which people do not usually expect from drinking their lower-fat milks. By drinking whole milk, people will feel more commodious which will curb their appetite and dissuade eating junk food, which keeps off the fat that contributes to weight gain.Since they are satisfied from their whole milk, they tend to drink it in smaller portions, which allows them to consume less calories and sugars that we dont need in our diet. As you can see, milk is more beneficial to our bodies than we may believe. Since the beginning of time we have relied on milk since infancy in one form or another. This hasnt shown any faults to their bodies, but has actually shown extreme improvement in the growth of height , muscle, and bone density when consumed on a regular basis. So, why do people suddenly think that milk is bad for us and conk out drinking it as adults?Times change, and there are people out in the world that try to find loopholes and excuses to why they dont have to drink milk. This snowballs into the misconception that drinking milk is not a healthy choice for us. But milks physical properties and nutritional value arent going to change just like that so its inevitable that milk will be healthy for us for the rest of our lives and for all the generations to come. People like to assume that if they have to choose a type of milk then it would be low-fat or better so they can keep their waistlines thin and be better protected from diseases.Sadly, this is not true. Whole milk would most definitely be the better choice because it is all natural and it contains all of the crucial components needed to stay disease-free and actually stay trimmer and fitter. So people of America and the world, milk is not a substance we should ever avoid. Milk is the building block of life which helps us all grow strong muscles, dense bones, and healthy immune systems. And to get the optimum outcome from milks effects, choose whole milk. Its all natural and contains everything our bodies need to thrive.Drink up Got milk?Works Cited Bergeson, Laine. Why Whole Milk is the Healthiest Choice. Experience Life. 31 Aug. 2009. meshing. 5 Feb. 2013. http//www. care2. com/greenliving/why-whole-milk-is-the-healthiest-choice. html Internet Brands. Nutrition of Low-fat Milk. FITDAY. 2011. Web. 5 Feb 2013. http//www. fitday. com/fitness-articles/nutrition/healthy-eating/the-nutrition-of-lowfat-milk. htmlb Jones-Shoeman, Cindy. Why milk is bad for you. 9 Feb. 2011. Web. 5 Feb. 2013. http//www. naturalnews. com/031255_milk_health. html.Keys, Ancel, Francisco Grande, and Joseph T. Anderson. Bias and falsification revisited Perspective on saturated fat. The American journal of clinical nutrition 27. 2 (1974) 188-212. United States. The Office of Dietary Supplements. The National Institute of Health. Vitamin A. June 24, 2011. Web Feb 19, 2013. http//ods. od. nih. gov/factsheets/VitaminA-QuickFacts/ United States. The Office of Dietary Supplements. The National Institute of Health. Vitamin D. June 24, 2011. Web Feb 19, 2013. http//ods. od. nih. gov/factsheets/VitaminD-HealthProfessional/.