'Forces That Shaped the Mi’Kmaq Relations with the Europeans\r'

'What forces shaped the Mi’kmaq traffic with the Europeans? When the early settlers of the Americas arrived on the eastward coast of what is now Canada, they discovered a people that was remarkably disparate from their own. inaugural impressions would deem these people as â€Å" ferocious” (source) â€Å"savages” (source) who spiritedd â€Å"miser up to(p) lives” (source). However, as cartridge holder went on the settlers began to realize just how deeply root this Aboriginal culture really was.The Mi’kmaq lived a simple nomadic hunter-gatherer intentstyle, up to(p) to recognize the stars and changing of the seasons leading them to a variety of varied sources of intellectual nourishment hooklike on the season. Culturally they were a sacred group, one that believed to live with the earth, not withdraw the earth and pr operateiced ceremonies to show handgrip of what the grunge gave them. Together they shared this dry land. distri only ifively they were free to pursue their own life path without restrictions, resulting in several informal partners, homosexuality, marriages and divorces.They were a mostly peaceful people, preferring the act of gift giving over state of war which they however resorted to when deemed necessary. To the Mi’kmaq warfare was neer spendd as a management to gain rule like their European counterparts but rather a port to seek revenge for wrongdoings. (paraphrase source) As the early European settlers and the Mi’kmaq people began to gravel familiar with each early(a), they found just about common grounds in these set and learnt to peacefully coexist with each other creating a positive traffichip strengthened on trade, alliance and confederateship.However, as time went on Mi’kmaqs values and precise means of survival were challenged when settler universe increased, warfare among the British and cut ended with British officially claiming the territory by means of several treaties and were eventually plump for up by the influx of stalwart snow. When the first cut settlers began to arrive to the subject the Mi’kmaq were optimistically curious of them. They viewed them as fel mortified man, as equals, who brought with them gifts of useful utensils, tools, alcohol, and weapons. source) The Mi’kmaq were quick to ceremoniously return the estimate to their new friends, sharing with them their knowledge of the land and giving them furs. The Mi’kmaq who roamed over a large territory saw no harm in allowing the small French race of (HOW MANY? ) to settle in the Bay of Fundy region. (Wicken print off †95-96) The similarities and differences amid the Mi’kmaq and French people two helped improved relations.Differentially, the Acadians were sedentary and relied on cultivation and livestock for food, which worked well as the Mi’kmaq were able to continue their nomadic pursuit gathering lifestyle undisturbed. Similarly, they shared a commonality in spirituality. Although they believed in different versions they were fascinated by each others beliefs and more or less Mi’kmaq were actually drawn into universality and baptized(HOW MANY? SOURCE). Trade furthered improved relations as time went on the Mi’kmaq would reach a point of habituation on European goods.Evidence of improved relations can been seen in intermarriage mingled with the two groups (HOW MANY? SOUCRE) Initially the Mi’kmaq had a much larger population and were never threatened by the settlers, in general seeing them as a friend with many benefits economically, culturally, and at times militarily (EVIDENCE OF MI’KMAQ FRENCH FIGHTING unitedly IN EARLY SETTLEMENT YEARS) They proceed these relations for about a century, with only minor involvements erupting every now and then, but nothing that would seriously jeopordize their relationship. source). Over that century the French popu lation remained quite low and numbered only about half of that of the Mi’kmaq population. This advantage acted as almost a power in which the Mi’kmaq able to preserve their ways and not knock over into French pressures to fully convert to Christianity or to living a sedentary unpolished lifestyle. This would all change when the Acadian population began to increase. (NUMBER OF increase AND SOURCE) As the Acadian population increased so did tensions between the Acadians and the Mi’kmaq.As the population in Acadian grew so did their need for more food. In order to get more food they needed more land that they could use to farm with. The Acadians would take land closemouthed the ocean which they could use to fish and overly they cleared forests which destroyed the habitats of animals which the Mi’kmaq employ to hunt. The Mi’kmaq were therefore forced to smelling elsewhere for food. There were reports of some Mi’kmaqs who were forced in la nd face for food, actually taking livestock from the Acadians.Threats would go back and forth over this ontogenesis tension. The Acadians would report these incidents to their council, but the council wise in noting that the Mi’kmaq were still in a majority choose not to retaliate them for their actions, preffering to avoid conflict and simply reimbursing the broken goods out of their own pockets. Evidence once more can be demonstrated in intermarriage between the two groups as only one aborniginal women has been recorded as marrying an Acadian over (time period).The growing population in British settlements would be seen as dread for the Mi’kmaqs who had a much more negative view of these settlers. Unlike the Acadian settlers a strong relationship had not been create over the last centrury. The British were incursive and they shared very little in common with them. †Ramsay cook argues that the first European settlers were intent to civilize the so called s avages through agriculture, technology, religion and language without realizing that these people were already civilized, just in a different way. In the early 18th century, the Mi’kmaq were a semi-nomadic peoples, who moved around the land freely according to the seasons. This lifestyle allowed them to live independently outside of the French and British querrals choosing for themselves when to go to war and when to agree to peace. -As conflict between England and France intensified in the 1740s tensions between the Acadian and Mi’kmaq populations grew.\r\n'