Physical Security Essay Example for Free

forcible credentials judgeSecuring networks or carcasss at bottom institutions and corporations is not enough. At present, security is not only concerned with the ethereal look of it but also with the tangible dynamics of sensual security. Although physical security seems too basic, establishing even the nigh sophisticated network security is useless if its physical environment does not keep it sheltered and protected. Security threats that have something to do with the physical aspect of institutions include burglary and theft.In this case, even the most established digital security system that functions within the computer networks will not be able to prevent these crimes. A breach in physical security necessitates the network or digital system of the institution unprotected to power interruptions that disrupts the security system, addition of hardware devices that may used to hack or spy into the system, remotion of hardware devices that paralyzes the system, copyi ng confidential data from the system through USBs, CDs, and much(prenominal), logging in the system promptly with reveal authorization, etcetera Stewart, 2004)The importance of lavishly standard physical security systems and policies ensure that aforementioned situations that seek to take a chance the position of institutions that might affect all its aspects, especially its finances, are avoided. Having a secure digital system is impressive, but having a secure digital system and physical environment is highly recommended. To uphold high quality standards of security, both the digital and physical aspects of security should be merged. Sturgeon (2004) defines this as marrying digital and physical security.Physical security involves the use of high-tech gadgets such as cameras that will be used for close monitoring, 24-hour moving picture coverage and storage, video recording triggered by movements, wireless and mobile installments within the physical environment, etc. (Physic al Security, 2008) The physical security climb is based on foursome principles or strategies. First, physical security follows the necessity of protect the network or institution, detecting security threats and possible risks, responding to these threats and risks, and allowing recovery for the network or institution from reparation or indemnities brought about by security breaches.This process requires setting up of security systems that will reach out these four phases of protecting (with the use of controlled access code systems that restricts involvement of the public to authorized personnel only), detecting (using surveillance systems and frequent check-up of the physical areas of institutions), responding (well-trained security officials and network protocols that carry out these responses to security threats and risks), and recovering. (Operational Security Standard on Physical Security, 2004) Second, physical security builds up on hierarchical zones that protect or sa feguard access to the security system.These hierarchical zones include the public zone (areas accessible to the public), reception zone (area wherein the boundary among the public and confine zones is determined), operations zone (areas private to personnel), security zone (areas private to only authorized personnel or visitors), and the high security zone (areas private to authorized and escorted personnel or visitors). indoors these zones, technological facilities and security officials are installed and designated respectively to carry out four phases in the previous approach discussed. (Operational Security Standard on Physical Security, 2004)The third approach in physical security is dogmatic access to determined hierarchical zones. This approach has something to do with controlling access most especially to restricted areas. It does not only control individual access, but is also concerned with the entry of materials considered to be potentially threatening or risky to sec urity, such as mobile phones and other technological gadgets, harmful objects such as knives, guns, and such, etc.Although institutions should consider this approach in physical security, controlling access should not fructify or restrict authorized individuals too much, allowing them ease in visiting each zone within the institution. Aside from security officials designated at every zone, there should also be systems that carry out state-of-the-art security protocols, such as technologies installed within the institution that asks for PIN or access numbers, access cards, biometrics, etc.Fourth, physical security systems should be designed to increase security levels in times of emergency or security threats. (Operational Security Standard on Physical Security, 2004) These four approaches, as recommended by the Treasury mount of Canada Secretariat follow the requirements of a strong and efficient physical security system. The concepts supported by these four approaches suggest ho w physical security systems and policies should be established in order to ensure that it will sue its purpose.However, accomplishing all the requirements in establishing a physical security system and a set of policies is not enough. Institutions should make sure that these elements of security are assessed and prised to ensure that it is properly sustained and it is up-to-date with trends in security technologies and processes. department of the evaluation process includes frequent training and drills for security officials, checking-in with technological innovations that improve quality of security measures and systems, and detect existing systems to determine much-needed replacements or tweaks.With all these information in mind, physical security is a rattling part in institutions that should not be neglected nor taken lightly. It complements digital network security systems, such that it prevents it from being jeopardized or subjected to external control, manipulation, and possible damages that affects the operations within the institution. Establishing a solid physical security system require that all aspects of the physical environment within an institution is identified.Mapping out requires that the institution determines where security is most needed and where access is most likely to be controlled. Aside from press release over the basics and technical details of physical security systems, institutions should provide time and effort to evaluate the system in order to ensure that it functions efficiently according to its purpose, and that it meets the highest requirements of quality standard physical security.